Yes, He Can – Slate.com Proves How Easy it is for Obama to Disclose His Donors

In a previous post, we quoted Obama as stating that disclosing his donor database would essentially be too difficult.  This morning, Slate.com has a headline story that explains how in just a few short hours, they were able to process a similarly sized database.

Barack Obama refuses to release the names of the 2 million-plus people who have given his campaign less than $200. According to campaign officials, it would be too difficult and time-consuming to extract this information from its database.

So how come we were able to do it in a couple hours?

Read it all.  And if this fires you up, please sign the petition to get Obama to disclose his donor records.


One Comment to “Yes, He Can – Slate.com Proves How Easy it is for Obama to Disclose His Donors”

  1. Donna Salmon says:

    While watching a discussion on Sunday involving all of the top
    analysts, they mentioned that Obama ran such a tremendous
    campaign, different than ever before. Then they mentioned
    that his campaign raised a lot of money from the sale of Obama
    bracelets/pin, etc. But what I found very interesting is the analysts then
    said the campaign workers collected names from those small sales.
    They increased the base of democrat party by collecting names.
    If it was so important to collect names of the small $5.00 contributors
    that bought a pin, WHY is it so hard to disclose the names of the
    $200. contributors. Easy answer……They already know who the
    Few donors are that gave numerous time.

Leave a Reply to Donna Salmon